您的AI财务准则专家
Understanding the Impact of SAD Nominal Amount on Audit Scope and Materiality
Which of the statements regarding SAD nominal amount is true? If we lower PM at a later stage of the audit, we should also revise our SAD nominal amount. We should communicate with those charged with governance the change in SAD nominal amount, including the revised testing scope. There are no circumstances for which it is appropriate to designate the SAD nominal amount at a percentage lower than 5% of PM. The amount we select for our SAD nominal amount has an effect on setting scopes and thresholds.

The statement that accurately reflects the concept of a Significant Audit Difference (SAD) nominal amount in the context of adjusting materiality is:

The amount we select for our SAD nominal amount has an effect on setting scopes and thresholds.

When the planning materiality (PM) is lowered during an audit, it may require a corresponding adjustment to the SAD nominal amount, as this amount is typically linked to the materiality level and influences the determination of the scope of audit procedures and the tolerable misstatement threshold. Communicating such changes to those charged with governance is also important for transparency and maintaining audit quality. However, there might be situations where designating the SAD nominal amount at a percentage lower than 5% of PM could be appropriate, depending on the specific circumstances and professional judgment exercised by the auditor.