您的AI财务准则专家
Understanding the Impact of SAD Nominal Amount on Audit Scopes and Thresholds
Which of the statements regarding SAD nominal amount is true? If we lower PM at a later stage of the audit, we should also revise our SAD nominal amount. We should communicate with those charged with governance the change in SAD nominal amount, including the revised testing scope. There are no circumstances for which it is appropriate to designate the SAD nominal amount at a percentage lower than 5% of PM. The amount we select for our SAD nominal amount has an effect on setting scopes and thresholds.

The statement that accurately reflects the concept of a Significant Audit Difference (SAD) nominal amount is:

The amount we select for our SAD nominal amount has an effect on setting scopes and thresholds.

This statement acknowledges that the SAD nominal amount, which represents the threshold for identifying and reporting significant differences during an audit, influences the determination of audit scopes and the level of testing required. The other statements either describe actions related to planning materiality (PM) or present incorrect information about the minimum percentage for designating SAD nominal amount, which is not universally fixed at 5% of PM. The communication with those charged with governance about changes in SAD is important, but it depends on the specific circumstances and the audit firm's policies.